Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Today's Date: 9/4/2010   Site Updated: 9/4/2010
Loading
 
MY CARE ACCOUNT
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Something I learned about BMI...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Something I learned about BMI...

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
SamE View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Location: USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
  Quote SamE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Something I learned about BMI...
    Posted: 30 Dec 2009 at 4:30pm
I'm 6' and 195lbs. That makes my BMI 26.4 - Lucky me, I'm considered overweight! Yet I am muscular (lift weights 3 times a week) and can run 5 miles easily. So I consider myself quite fit and definitely not overweight. I learned to not be defined or discouraged by my BMI number. I would look horrible at 180lbs. (which means I would be "normal" weight)....Just some food for thought.
Back to Top
Webmaster Mike View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Location: USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 25
  Quote Webmaster Mike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Jan 2010 at 9:15am
Hi, SamE!

First, thank you for visiting DiabetesCare.net.Please let us know how we can better serve you with content on our site; we're always listening! Reach out to me directly at mike@diabetescare.net.

And don't forget to keep track of your BMI, Blood Glucose, and daily exercise activities and nutrition intake with our FREE "MyCare Tools." You will find access to those tools on the home page of our website, or on your "MyCare Profile" page. You will have to be a registered user to access the tools, but remember, it's FREE!
Back to Top
sharon.rd View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Location: USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6
  Quote sharon.rd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jan 2010 at 11:50am
Yes, the BMI number does need some "interpretation". A typical NFL lean football player would have a high BMI because of increased musculature, not body fat. There are other assessment tools, such as skinfold calipers, or the biolectical impedence body fat analyzers, that can give you another measure of your fitness. All such tools have their limits. For instance, the skin folder calipers should be used by a trained and practiced person, since location on the body and technique is important. Bioelectrical impedence "machines" are based on body water, and so dehydration or fliud retention would obscure the results. If you like what you see in the mirror, you are probably good to go!
Back to Top
gpaul7 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Location: USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote gpaul7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Jun 2010 at 10:43pm
I find skin-fold calipers do a decent job of estimating body fat if you're not too overweight. Most calipers max out at 60mm of skinfold, which is inadequate to measure most people over 300 pounds.
I own a pair and have tested hundreds of people with fairly consistent results. They do require some practice and skill.
I'm personally not a fan of bio-impedance devices at all as the same person can test quite differently over a 24 hr. period, due to daily water fluctuations.
As sharon.rd notes, BMI for athletes can be misleading.
Here's a nice link that posts interactive pictures of males and females at different body fat percentages.
Click the pic that looks most like you for an estimate of your body fat.

http://askthetrainer.com/fat-loss.html

Edited by gpaul7 - 04 Jun 2010 at 10:49pm
Back to Top
swub View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Location: USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
  Quote swub Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jul 2010 at 4:56pm
Isn't a water tank test the most accurate?
Back to Top
gpaul7 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Location: USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
  Quote gpaul7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jul 2010 at 6:06pm
Originally posted by swub

Isn't a water tank test the most accurate?


Yes, under-water weighing is considered accurate, although there can be some issues with lung volumes that lead to buoyancy, i.e. estimated versus measured.
Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) could be more accurate.
DEXA uses two X-ray energies to measure body fat, muscle, and bone mineral.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down